In an escalating field scenario reflecting the steadfastness of the deterrence equation and the growth of offensive capabilities, the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon continued to carry out a series of precise and focused operations against the positions and troop concentrations of the Zionist enemy army

. These operations targeted its operational depth and vital military systems as part of Operation Protective Edge, confirming that the Lebanese front is a powerful presence in confronting the aggression and is capable of imposing new equations that transcend the boundaries of traditional engagement.

Strategic Strikes Target the Heart of the Zionist Command

In the most prominent and significant operation, the Resistance targeted the “Shraga” military base north of the occupied city of Acre – the administrative headquarters of the “Golani” Brigade – with a squadron of attack drones. This operation carries strategic dimensions, as it strikes one of the most important field command and control centers of the occupation entity and exposes the fragility of its defense system against the Resistance’s drone arsenal.

The strikes also targeted the Mount Neria base, part of the Meron airbase, which specializes in monitoring and managing air operations. This reflects a clear focus on disrupting the enemy’s intelligence and coordination capabilities in the northern arena.

Intensive Field Attrition: Targeting Enemy Gatherings and Artillery Positions
On the level of direct attrition, the resistance carried out a series of simultaneous strikes targeting enemy troop concentrations and vehicles at several locations, most notably:

Al-Qantara.

Kfar Yuval.

Miskav Am.

Beit Hillel.

Yiftah Barracks.

Friz Hill in Ainata.

Kahil Triangle in Maroun al-Ras.

Al-Sidr Hill.

The newly established artillery positions in the settlements of Avivim and Yir’on were also targeted, sending a clear message that the enemy’s attempts to bolster its firepower on the border will not go unanswered and will be met with a direct and painful response.

Targeting Armored Vehicles and Destroying Equipment

In a significant development in the ground battles, the resistance announced the targeting of an Israeli Merkava tank in the town of Houla with a guided missile. The tank was seen burning, a scene reflecting the effectiveness of the resistance’s anti-tank weapons and confirming the continued collapse of the Merkava myth in the face of the fighting will of the resistance fighters.

Precise Sniping: Confirmed Casualties Among the Enemy

In the context of these qualitative operations, the resistance revealed the execution of a precise sniper operation targeting an Israeli soldier in the vicinity of the Khiam detention center, confirming a direct hit. This reflects the presence of close-quarters field operations and the resistance fighters’ ability to engage directly and inflict casualties on the enemy.

Bombing Settlements: Establishing the Equation of Deterrence by Fire

In response to the aggression and as part of its policy of early warning, the resistance intensified its targeting of northern settlements. Rocket barrages struck:

Kiryat Shmona (several times).

Metula. This repeated shelling reflects the consolidation of the “settlements for aggression” equation and confirms that the enemy’s home front is now under direct fire, given the inability of its defense systems to provide complete protection.

Attack Drones: The Escalating Weapon of Decisiveness
The recent operations have witnessed the intensive use of attack drones, whether in targeting the Shraga base or gatherings of Israeli enemy soldiers at the Samaqa site in the occupied Kfarshouba hills. This indicates a significant development in the resistance’s tactics and its ability to carry out precise and deep strikes with minimal cost and maximum impact.

A New Equation is Taking Shape
These simultaneous and diverse operations—from sniping to missiles, drones, and targeting armored vehicles—confirm that the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon is steadily moving towards imposing a complex deterrent equation that will drain the enemy on the ground, strike at its strategic depth, and keep its settlements under constant threat.

These strikes also reflect the growing failure of the Zionist enemy to contain the northern front, and its inability to prevent the initiative from being transferred to the resistance, which proves day after day that the “Eaten Straw” battle is not just a tactical response, but an open escalating path that is redrawing the balance of power in the region.