A Comprehensive Confrontation Map: The Leader’s Vision on the Day of the Cry to Dismantle Zionist Soft Strategies

In his pivotal speech on the 2026 Day of the Cry, the Leader does not merely offer a superficial description of the imminent danger facing the nation. Rather, he proceeds to dismantle its tools with meticulous strategic precision. He asserts that the glittering slogans brandished by America, Israel, and their regional allies—such as “changing the Middle East,” “combating terrorism,” “freedom,” “human rights,” and “democracy”—are, in essence, nothing more than “deceptive and false slogans” intended to mask the complete subjugation of the region’s peoples with empty promises and continuous international deception.

The Leader presents the international community and its subservient regimes with irrefutable evidence that exposes the falsity of these claims. He clearly states that “Israel kills a Palestinian woman every half hour with direct and unlimited American support and weapons,” asking in a tone of condemnation that places everyone before their moral and historical responsibilities: Where are the human rights and women’s rights they so readily proclaim while entire populations are being exterminated and homes demolished over their inhabitants’ heads, under the supervision and sponsorship of the very powers that claim to protect these values?

Details of the “Soft Zionist Path” and the Dangers of Infiltration

In the Leader’s 2026 address, a detailed explanation of what he called the “Soft Zionist Path” stands out. This path uses “normalization” as a primary gateway for infiltration, which he considers, in reality, “a planned and dangerous aggression against the peoples of the region.” The Leader reveals a truth that is often overlooked: “The normalizing states are unaware that normalization is an integral part of the comprehensive Zionist plan, not a departure from it or a retreat from it.” Rather, it is a modern colonial tool aimed at subjugating the nation from within without the constant need for direct military confrontation in its initial stages.

The leader provides shocking and direct examples of this infiltration, which has transcended political boundaries to reach sensitive and dangerous sectors. He reveals that “Zionist companies are now buying real estate in Mecca and Medina,” a precedent that foreshadows a grave danger to the holiest places on earth. He adds that “Gulf states have opened the door for Zionist Jews to infiltrate all fields, as has happened in technology, communications, and naturalization,” emphasizing that the enemy is attempting, through this subtle approach, to control education and media, and to manipulate their cultural content, ultimately aiming for absolute control over these countries’ national economies and making them hostages to Zionist interests.

Exposing the Double Contradiction in Confronting the Scheme

This is the “Zionist scheme” in its entirety; it is not limited to bombing, forced displacement, and the “New Middle East” they seek to dominate, but extends to include subtle infiltration into the holiest places on earth and the vital institutions of Arab states. The Leader exposed a painful double contradiction when he pointed out that the regimes that ban the slogan “Death to America” and consider it a form of “extremism” are the same regimes that open their doors wide to Zionist companies that buy real estate in the Two Holy Mosques. He asked clearly and firmly: Who is truly the “extremist” in this topsy-turvy reality?

Arab Positions: Complete Subservience and Suppression of Sympathy

The Leader then analyzes the position of Arab regimes and official media, considering it one of the most dangerous points in his speech. While the Zionist onslaught at the beginning of the millennium was met with a degree of embarrassment, he observes that today most regimes, governments, and leaders have rushed to declare their “loyalty and submission to the enemies.” These regimes have gone so far as to present “complete subservience to America, Britain, and Israel as if it were perfectly normal and unobjectionable,” even attempting to portray this subservience and dependence as an “acceptable” and realistic option that the people must accept.

The Leader reveals shocking details about the suppression of freedoms in this context, noting that in some Gulf countries, even a simple tweet expressing sympathy for the Palestinian people is punishable by imprisonment and hefty fines. He asserts that “the suppression of voices expressing solidarity with the Palestinian people in some Gulf countries has become worse than in America, Britain, and Europe.” This situation forces Arab regimes to confront reality: if suppressing solidarity with Palestine is worse than in Western countries, what kind of “Arabism” do they claim to uphold? And if fatwas prohibiting prayers for the resistance fighters are issued by “corrupt scholars linked to these regimes,” what kind of “Islam” do they represent?

Media Memory and the Trap of “Agents for Iran”

The Leader invokes recent history to expose the destructive role of Arab media outlets that dealt with the victories of the resistance, as happened in 2000 and 2006, with levels of deliberate distortion and belittlement. Today, he observes that “Zionist mouthpieces have directed all their criticism against Hamas and the Qassam Brigades,” attempting to undermine Gaza’s remarkable resilience through demoralization and discrediting. The enemy and its allies also seek to distort independent stances by labeling them as mere “proxy action on behalf of Iran,” a paradox exposed by the Leader, who asks: If a Palestinian defending his land and holy sites is considered an “Iranian proxy,” then where is patriotism and where is the cause in the logic of these propagandists? (Here, the speech invokes Trump’s statement describing the Gulf states as better allies than NATO, as external evidence confirming that loyalty to America is no longer a secret but has been openly declared by the enemy.)

The Dangers of Inaction and the Psychological Diagnosis of Defeat

The Leader then moves on to describe the “state of inaction” and its grave dangers to the future of the nation, asserting that this inaction is what enables the enemies to achieve absolute control. The enemies want the nation to be like “chickens and sheep” in the face of America and Israel, “slaughtered and killed without any reaction.” He sternly warns that “the cost of surrender is the loss of everything: this world and the hereafter, freedom and dignity, homelands and honor, security and stability,” describing this situation as “an extremely dangerous regression” in the nation’s reality. He also exposes the “psychological engineering” of the media.