Fadlallah to the Lebanese authorities: What the enemy failed to achieve on the battlefield, he will not achieve through politics.

MP Hassan Fadlallah, a member of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc in Lebanon, announced that the resistance will confront the enemy whenever it tries to advance anywhere, warning the Lebanese authorities “against the consequences of making any concessions or commitments to the enemy in direct negotiations.”

During the memorial ceremony held by Hezbollah for the missing martyr Osama Adib Awada, Fadlallah said, “The enemy is trying to compensate for its failure to achieve its goals of controlling the south, destroying the resistance, and eliminating its presence, by committing massacres against civilians, especially in the last few hours.”

He stressed that “when the enemy tries to expand its occupation, it is natural for the resistance to confront it, knowing that it has not adhered to the ceasefire, and it is the one that violates it, and it is the one that wants to occupy this land and remain on it, and the option available to us is to stand firm, persevere, resist, confront, and prevent it from remaining on our land.”

He added: “There is talk about a ceasefire. For us, what matters is that the enemy fully and completely commits to a ceasefire, and that he does not try to attack our country and our villages, or seek to occupy any new point, but rather he must stop firing completely.”

Fadlallah pointed out that “while we are fully prepared to cooperate and extend a hand to save our country, we warn against the consequences of making any concessions or commitments to the enemy in the direct negotiations that we reject, because there are those who are trying to disrupt a major achievement that can be realized for the benefit of our country through the American-Iranian negotiations.”

He stressed that “the authority should not be arrogant and deny reality, especially since it will not be able to implement what it offers to the enemy in its concessions, because it will clash with a great popular will and the will of the resistance, and it does not have the ability to implement these concessions, but rather it is only providing free services to the enemy, and therefore it must reconsider its options, and not submit to the conditions of the occupation.”

He also stressed that “we will not allow this authority to give this enemy through politics what it failed to achieve on the battlefield… In return, it can benefit from our call for cooperation, convergence, and understanding on national foundations that protect sovereignty.”