Iran’s Nuclear Deal, failure for Arab diplomacy
By: Sajad abedi
After the victory of the Islamic Revolution, the rulers of Hijaz, taking into account the strong opposition between the political and religious notion and their interests with the foundations of the Islamic Revolution, used all their financial and political capacities to support the terrorist cells and internal and external rioters.
The political structure and territorial integrity of Iran face serious challenges. This attempt, although in the early years of the victory of the Islamic Revolution and the holy defense, created antagonisms to Iran’s newly established system, but some years later it was faced with many failures, while events such as the testimony of the pilgrims of Baitullah al-Haram at the ceremony of blaming the idolaters in 1986 and The tragic incident of Mina and the martyrdom of Ayatollah Nemer and events of this kind brought the Iranian community to heart with bitter memories.
Along with these maladaptive approaches of the Saudi rulers during the nuclear talks and their efforts to bring to a standstill the talks between Iran and the Western countries over the peaceful nuclear activities of our country did not go a long way. Therefore, implementation can be considered one of Al Saud’s most important defeats in 2015. The defeat made Saudi Arabia close to Tel Aviv to advance anti-Iranian policies and in recent months there has been a surge in spending between Saudi princes and Zionist regime officials.
With the onset of regional crises, the Saudi rulers, while helping the rioters and terrorists to burn the region, tried to extend the fingerprints to Iran and set the Islamic Republic as the number one accused of creating a crisis in the region. On the other hand, he relied on the oil resources and the great wealth he had received on the Saudi side to compensate for their failures in the region, while affecting the price of the global oil, a large part of the wealth generated for the political alignment of the small countries of the region Apply against Iran. Despite all the abuses, the Saudis are aware of the extent of Iran’s influence in the region and are following the concerns of Iran’s relations and interactions with Qatar and Oman. Therefore, they are supposed to support and support the trans-regional and major powers in order to strengthen their position in their region in order to compensate their weaknesses and failures against Iran. Although turning to such a policy has led to Saudi rulers.
These supports, of course, are counterproductive in the end. In the past year, Saudi Arabia failed not only to collapse in the Syrian crisis, but to find the way to the Astana Summit, which hosted the most important peace talks in Syria, but even in the oil talks, it was forced to consider the interests of Iran and respect Iran’s share of The black gold market will reduce its oil production under severe economic pressure. Even in diplomatic matters, Saudi Arabia, in spite of trying to mobilize resources against Iran, has had to retreat a lot, for example, with the election of the President of Lebanon, Al Saud has agreed with the choice of Hezbollah’s support.
Saudi Arabia has long played the role of a strategic asset to protect the interests of Europe and the United States in the region, and on the other hand, along with some Gulf States, it is one of the most important sources of revenue for arms manufacturers in the United States and Europe. Therefore, it is not possible to criticize the Westerners from Saudi Arabia. This trend seems to be followed by the government of Donald Trump, taking into account US interests in the region, despite his sharp commentary on Saudi politics.
On the other hand, with the arrival of King Salman and his new approaches to Saudi political administration, internal disputes within the Saudi dynasty have developed, and the military conflict that exists among the princes seems to be due to the political hurdle in the country Provides some political turmoil and instability in Saudi Arabia. The realization of this issue is unpredictable in the current situation, since over the years, the Saudi people have been subjected to a political revolution, and their country’s subjugation against its political rulers.
Saudi Arabia was one of the first designers and supporters of the Iraqi crisis, and given the initial and rapid progress of ISIL and the terrorists, they had a sense of prosperity and achieve their ambitions, which was why the percentage of the implementation of the goals and the spread of influence in Syria.
But the failures of the Saudi rulers in Iraq and Syria drove them to execute their plans in Yemen. The entry of this country into the Yemeni crisis was one of the most outrageous plans of the Saudi rulers, since the resistance of the people against foreign invasion, the prolonged crisis, and the high cost of finances reduced its position. Saudi Arabia sought to narrow the conditions for the Yemeni people by launching a regional offensive. But with the rise of Saudi Arabia’s crisis and failure in the invasion, supporters and allies who had previously promised to accompany the rulers of the country separated one way from Saudi Arabia. Separation of Egypt, and even being opposed to the Saudi rulers, the discontent of Oman, which initially opposed the move, was disappointing for other countries participating in the coalition.
Influence and domination of the region by considering solutions such as money and lobbies directly and indirectly with the West was one of the ways of the Saudi rulers, but with the coming of Malik Salman, Saudi Arabia’s expansionism was publicly revealed and led to the country in the hand To take actions that go beyond the tact and wisdom of the Saudi rulers. The credo of Saudi Arabia made it difficult to reach its goals. There is no doubt that Saudi Arabia has always sought to undermine Iran’s prominent role in the international and regional arena, and its rulers have no sense in pursuing this ambitious goal of making abusive political movements.
Aturally, the continuation of such a process in the future will be negatively affected by the deadlock in reaching Saudi plans in the future. Saudi political recklessness, which is largely irrational, stems from the mentality of the Saudi rulers of Western support for Saudi action. But evidence suggests that Westerners such as the United States and Britain are cynical about this country, and arms sales to the country from the West have provided a more favorable context for Saudi Arabia to arrest terrorist groups. On the other hand, these Saudi rulers were forced to buy weapons for more influence in the region and control of Iran. The country’s set of spending to achieve such a goal along with today’s economic problems and the dilemma of living in some of the less developed cities in Saudi Arabia will in the future lead to a decline in the political status of the Saudi family.
Saudi Arabia’s turbulent approach in recent years and its role in waging war and violence in the region have allowed the plundering of human resources and raw materials in the Muslim world to the West.